ADVERTISING IN BLACK MAGAZINES AIN'T WORTH IT? Every year, the NAACP sends out a survey to big corporations asking what percentage of their advertising budget is used in black-owned media. The corporations get a grade — an F, if they don't participate — based on their relationship with black-owned businesses. The companies dread it, but they say advertising in black-owned media is not cost-effective.
"All things being equal, we'd have no problem supporting" black-owned media, said [an anonymous chief marketing officer for a major brand], but "a lot of the true African-American owned media companies are small and very decentralized. That doesn't fit our strategy of needing to have a national reach. We have looked at some of the options, but the delivery is so small in relation to cost it doesn't fit our strategy."
[AA]
Oh my god! This is such crap!? Black people internationally are one of the largest groups of consumers on the planet. Now, whether I agree with that or not-is nor here or there but this, is just rude.
I'm tired, some people are just not very nice.
Rantmagazine, you should learn to read critically. The article isn't about corporations advertising to the black demographic, rather whether it is cost effective to utilize black-owned media to do so.
I agree with the chief marketing officer.
I can understand where he's coming from on that. It's true, and one of the biggest problems with black media (except for BET, I guess). Unless you've got a paper in a large market, like the Afro in DC, or the Philly Trib, you're not going to get the mass audience. And even then…