In the News, Is Race Omitted at the Cost of Safety?
Journalism
 

susansmith

At left is Susan Smith, the South Carolina woman who, in 1994, alleged that a black man carjacked her and kidnapped her two sons. After a nine-day manhunt that did little more than augment racial tensions in Smith's community, the 23-year-old confessed to driving her car into a lake near her home, drowning her children inside.

Smith's story immediately came to mind when I read the article "Omitting Race: Politically correct or good crime reporting?" on the Society of Professional Journalists Web site. The title says it all: Some people consider it dangerous for newspapers to avoid racial identifiers when reporting on crime stories. Their argument being, why wouldn't you be as descriptive as possible when discussing loose criminals? Isn't it the most responsible thing for a paper concerned with community safety to do?

Sally Lehrman, the author of the article, says no.

Even if all we care about is catching the criminal, identifying race in a news report could easily do more harm than help. In one well-known case in Oneonta, N.Y., an elderly white woman whose home was burglarized remembered little except that the intruder was a young black man with a cut on his hand. Police collected the names of black male students at the local state university and stopped 200 young African Americans in all, checking for cuts. In the end, they never arresting anyone. When police and the community are blinded by ideas about what a particular race looks like, whole groups suffer from suspicion and the actual culprit can escape.

What do you think?

Comments (6)

No. 1 · Chic Noir

When the person has not been caught, by all means give a full discription. When or if the person has been caught there is really no reason to add the persons race in with the story.

I will add that its a known fact that many whit.e people can not differenate between us. A black man who looks like Cord may have robbed them but the whi.te police officer is out looking for black man that looks like Akon.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 8:24 pm
No. 2 · Robert

I find it insulting when they don't give the race, but they use buzz words like "young men" or "youths". The other funny thing is that they will give a description of the clothes but not the race of the individual.

Posted: May 17, 2008 at 3:19 am
No. 3 · daria of Gorgeous Black Women

I have particular assumptions about the race, age, education, mental state, etc. of people based on the crime and how it was carried out. It's not just me. The FBI has "profiles" that are accurate probably 75% of the time. The same can be said for some victims. For example, if on the news I see that a woman got raped while running on the Charles River at 11 p.m. by myself, I will bet good money that said woman is under 35, probably single and works/lives by the river.

We all make certain subconscious assumptions, whether or not they tell us the race of the person. I'd rather not know than have some absurd description like Miscellaneous Black Man sketch released, having every normal looking black man between the ages of 15 and 45, 5'8 to 6'4, 150 to 300 lbs getting hassled.

Posted: May 17, 2008 at 6:17 pm
No. 4 · daria of Gorgeous Black Women

As for Susan Smith, though I was 10 when that happened, I thought it was crap. Unless you're rich and they're holding your kids for ransom, or they escaped from somewhere and need a hostage, no one's taking your kids. It had to be someone she knew, a pedophile or her.

Posted: May 17, 2008 at 6:20 pm
No. 5 · JM

I agree with Chic Noir. An accurate description is necessary when they're still looking for the guy, but adding race to the post-arrest commentary is as unnecessary and ridiculous as saying "The fugitive, a tall, handsome man with short red hair and green eyes, was apprehended…"

Then again, from my faint memories of TV news, I seem to remember that they would generally give the name, age, and home city of the apprehended person, plus a picture if available, and that's it. (But really I almost watch the news)

As for old Susan Smith, that whole b.s. was parodied really nicely on the South Park episode "Butters' Very Own Episode".

Posted: May 18, 2008 at 5:56 pm
No. 6 · Josh

@ Chic Noir: I agree that race is helpful (though not conclusive by itself) in identifying people. Unfortunately, it seems like too many white people don't notice details of black people enough to give a good description including skin tone. White people (in my experience) never say "light-skinned" or "dark-skinned" when describing black people, even though those would be helpful modifiers.

Posted: May 21, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

Scroll Posts
 


Stereohyped Team

Editor
Lauren Williams

Editor-at-Large
Cord Jefferson

Editorial Director
David Hauslaib

Managing Editor
Andrew Belonsky

Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

Our Network

Jossip The gossip's gossip sheet

Mollygood Splaying celebrities from A- to D-list

Queerty Free of an agenda. Except that gay one

Advertise

Snag our ad info

Roll Blogs

Afrobella
All Hip Hop
The Assimilated Negro
The B Life
Black Agenda Report
Black Male Appreciation
Black Prof
Black Voices
Bossip
Cake & Ice Cream
Clips and Kisses
Clutch Magazine
Concrete Loop
Crunk & Disorderly
Essence
EUR Web
The Fashion Bomb
Giant
Greasy Guide
Hip Candy
HipHopDX
Hip & Pop
Juicy News
King
Miss Info
Mollygood
My Urban Report
Nah Right
Necole Bitchie
Nova Slim
Panache Report
Racialicious
The Rap Up
Rhymes With Snitch
Sandra Rose
Shake Your Beauty
Straight Outta NYC
SOHH
TMZ
Vibe
Wendy Williams
XXL
Young, Black, Fabulous

RSS

 
Copyright 2008 Jossip Initiatives LLC