
KOBE BRYANT You can't really call this an acquittal, since the 2004 case was dismissed. But for all Kobe Bryant went through in the press (deserved or not…who knows?) after he was accused of raping a hotel employee, it might as well have. Also, the legal and jewelry bills had to have been sky high.
Hey now, Lauren, go easy on us lawyers! As a former defense lawyer, I have to step up and say that the great mass of us don't have the luxury of throwing tons of resources into a case: We take our clients as they are and do the best we can no matter what, and that's a damn important thing.
Sure, it's pretty clear that R. Kelly is guilty as the day is long, but I would suggest that when a person is accused and the victim won't testify against him and the only other witness is highly implausible, that person *should* get acquitted. Fairly recent American history is full of examples of similar trials with less convincing evidence where the (poor, black) defendant *did* get locked up. R. Kelly's acquittal doesn't right that wrong, but it also doesn't mean we should blame defense lawyers.
OK. Rant over. I definitely won't feel bad if he gets it Nino Brown style (as someone said in the earlier post on this topic).
Hmmm… It might have seemed that way, but I wasn't blaming lawyers (or anyone, really), just acknowledging the fact that celebs have a lot more money than the average person to use for their defense when they find themselves in these positions and, in fact, probably have their high-priced lawyers to thank for their acquittals. Snoop, OJ Simpson, and Puffy all had Johnnie Cochran (RIP) defend them in the trials referenced in this post. Now, that's a defense the Average Joe cannot afford. Anyway, some of my best friends are lawyers!
Sure, sure, that's what they all say! "Some of my best friends are lawyers . . . I just wouldn't want my daughter to date one!"
Seriously, that disparity between the way justice works for rich and poor is something worth talking about. Just don't tell Wesley Snipes.