
MICHAEL JACKSON It was the allegation that no one, including the jury at his trial, really wanted to believe — that our hopelessly-creepy-and-weird-but-still-oddly-beloved Michael Jackson was a sicko pedophile. He was acquitted in 2005, after a suitably weird trial, for which he showed up in his pajamas.
Hey now, Lauren, go easy on us lawyers! As a former defense lawyer, I have to step up and say that the great mass of us don't have the luxury of throwing tons of resources into a case: We take our clients as they are and do the best we can no matter what, and that's a damn important thing.
Sure, it's pretty clear that R. Kelly is guilty as the day is long, but I would suggest that when a person is accused and the victim won't testify against him and the only other witness is highly implausible, that person *should* get acquitted. Fairly recent American history is full of examples of similar trials with less convincing evidence where the (poor, black) defendant *did* get locked up. R. Kelly's acquittal doesn't right that wrong, but it also doesn't mean we should blame defense lawyers.
OK. Rant over. I definitely won't feel bad if he gets it Nino Brown style (as someone said in the earlier post on this topic).
Hmmm… It might have seemed that way, but I wasn't blaming lawyers (or anyone, really), just acknowledging the fact that celebs have a lot more money than the average person to use for their defense when they find themselves in these positions and, in fact, probably have their high-priced lawyers to thank for their acquittals. Snoop, OJ Simpson, and Puffy all had Johnnie Cochran (RIP) defend them in the trials referenced in this post. Now, that's a defense the Average Joe cannot afford. Anyway, some of my best friends are lawyers!
Sure, sure, that's what they all say! "Some of my best friends are lawyers . . . I just wouldn't want my daughter to date one!"
Seriously, that disparity between the way justice works for rich and poor is something worth talking about. Just don't tell Wesley Snipes.