After drafting a lengthy and annoyed post this morning based on this NY Post story, in which a "source" said that Al Sharpton and Barack Obama exchanged heated words during a phone call about Sean Bell, which Sharpton saying that he had hoped Obama would side with the Bell family and instead saw the situation as "an opportunity to grand-stand in from of white people," something in the wording of the article gave me pause and I scrapped it. If Sharpton really wanted to say that, he probably would have said it himself in front of cameras. It's a good thing I scrapped it — Sharpton's people say that either the unnamed source or the reporters fabricated quotes from that conversation, which was actually positive. The rep also said Sharpton was alone during the phone call. Nevertheless, we'll surely see headlines all day about how Sharpton and Obama now hate each other, which we will be encouraged to accept as further proof that Obama is too black for whites and too white for blacks. Then again, some people might have seen a rift between Sharpton and Obama as a positive…
I would definitely take this report with a huge grain of salt. I've heard several commentaries by Al Sharpton on Obama and none of them have been negative in the least. In fact, he was on Tom Joyner this morning and warned folks against the white media's intent to divide the black community into Obama vs Wright.
This makes sense. Obama's a media whore so if he had words for Obama, he'd have made them public.
well isn't every person running for the presidency a media "whore"….for lack of a better word. I don't see McCain or Billary running from any promotional spotlight…
jess,
Yeah I didn't really get the "media whore" reference either.
Jess and Anon,
My bad. I meant to say Sharpton's a media whore. Big time typo coming from this Obama-ite.
Anyway, I call Sharpton a media whore cuz he's more concerned with self-promotion. I can't respect a man that's gung-ho for White-on-Black crime and is silent on Black-on-Black crime.